Manu/alchemy Hack
-
LittleDemon
- Regular
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 7:50 am
Depends on how those gays in corea coded it. It might send a packet which gives you a 'new' item (the one you manu-ed). If you catch this one and keep sending it, well..you'll get mass items ~_~.LittleDemon wrote: No there isn't.
Just record the packets you send when your manu'ing. And find out which one is the correct packet. Once you found the right packet just keep sending.
Catch is you need the correct items in you back-pack. If you run out of materials then well its obvious nothing is made.
<img src='http://i9.tinypic.com/2vs292h.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
-
RageIlluminati
- Outpost bitch
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:45 am
have you tested it?NeukenInDeKeuken wrote:Depends on how those gays in corea coded it. It might send a packet which gives you a 'new' item (the one you manu-ed). If you catch this one and keep sending it, well..you'll get mass items ~_~.LittleDemon wrote: No there isn't.
Just record the packets you send when your manu'ing. And find out which one is the correct packet. Once you found the right packet just keep sending.
Catch is you need the correct items in you back-pack. If you run out of materials then well its obvious nothing is made.
<img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/hbest-gamemaster2.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/hbsoccer-owner.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/scorpa-rider.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/logout-master.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <br>.<br>................................Ego sum Rage, flagellum Dei!<br><br>The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself? (bash.org)
I'm famous for being lazy and only handing out idea's.RageIlluminati wrote:have you tested it?NeukenInDeKeuken wrote:Depends on how those gays in corea coded it. It might send a packet which gives you a 'new' item (the one you manu-ed). If you catch this one and keep sending it, well..you'll get mass items ~_~.LittleDemon wrote: No there isn't.
Just record the packets you send when your manu'ing. And find out which one is the correct packet. Once you found the right packet just keep sending.
Catch is you need the correct items in you back-pack. If you run out of materials then well its obvious nothing is made.
<img src='http://i9.tinypic.com/2vs292h.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
-
RageIlluminati
- Outpost bitch
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:45 am
well.. in that way I can say that, this is impossible... not client sends packet that confirms of geting new item... but server calculates probability of making item and sends you the packet of new item...NeukenInDeKeuken wrote:I'm famous for being lazy and only handing out idea's.RageIlluminati wrote:have you tested it?NeukenInDeKeuken wrote:Depends on how those gays in corea coded it. It might send a packet which gives you a 'new' item (the one you manu-ed). If you catch this one and keep sending it, well..you'll get mass items ~_~.
<img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/hbest-gamemaster2.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/hbsoccer-owner.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/scorpa-rider.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <img src='http://helbreath.pri.ee/userbars/logout-master.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> <br>.<br>................................Ego sum Rage, flagellum Dei!<br><br>The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself? (bash.org)