Project: Anti-Hack Application

Acidx · Post by **Acidx** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:50 am

i just started a new application/project
this is a Anti-Hack Application that runs in the background
Currently i have it scanning the Proccess list
Any known common Hack like proccess will be reported as a violation
The violation will intern send to the client
Causing the client to end and a little safety log will be sent
to server it is configured to, this is all very simple at the moment

The anti-hack client will be linked into the Client.EXE with simple code
it will then run a Compare To check for consistency of the client
Making sure no one can ASM Hack/Edit the client
the client file for the Consistency check will be stored in an encrypted file
Encrypted with a FFGI Hash style Encryption that is basicly VERY HARD
to crack... every binary for the Anti-Hack will also be Encrypted and will have hundreds of double checks to be sure no one can edit the anti-hack as well..

The next thing i am adding to the Anti-hack client is a Process program scanner, wich intern scans every process's program and checks for Caption and shit for known hacking programs and shit
Then another method will be Scanning for known Engine maps for programs like WPE, Comview, TSearch and other known major hacking programs...

These methods will make it VERY VERY hard to get around this anti-hack... and i know once it is finished, it will eliminate hacking in helbreath for a while untill someone very talented comes along to break it down and decrypt/exploit the program its self...
of course it will be an activily updated application..
And of course i will give a SAFE and propper way for most servers to use this.. and i will make sure people cannot take the info for setting it up and get around other peoples security like i said Everything is gunna be encrypted to the max to secure safety...
Well look forward to this i will be releasing it sometime next month
and ill post some screenshots as well while i am developing it.

Orkl · Post by **Orkl** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:10 pm

Just letting you know, I fucking hate the way you write your posts. The forum will put the new line in automatically, you dont need to hit enter so much >_<

Sentinel · Post by **Sentinel** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:49 am

Slayer wrote: I'm not going to bother reading that post, got a headache, don't need another.

So harsh. Lol @ Orkl... Sounds good... Let us know when it's done.. We might want to write a review and then do a trial-error time. Acid, you still run HBOxy?

Acidx · Post by **Acidx** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:12 am

Sentinel wrote:
Slayer wrote: I'm not going to bother reading that post, got a headache, don't need another.
So harsh. Lol @ Orkl... Sounds good... Let us know when it's done.. We might want to write a review and then do a trial-error time. Acid, you still run HBOxy?

Nah i dont, i am working with HBX now..
and guys!!!
Fuck off i cant help it its a habbit

Sentinel · Post by **Sentinel** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:25 pm

Acidx wrote:
Sentinel wrote:
Slayer wrote: I'm not going to bother reading that post, got a headache, don't need another.
So harsh. Lol @ Orkl... Sounds good... Let us know when it's done.. We might want to write a review and then do a trial-error time. Acid, you still run HBOxy?
Nah i dont, i am working with HBX now..
and guys!!!
Fuck off i cant help it its a habbit

Spelling Correction! *habit* vs *habbit*.. HABIT!

bone-you · Post by **bone-you** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:31 pm

Sentinel wrote:
Acidx wrote:
Sentinel wrote: So harsh. Lol @ Orkl... Sounds good... Let us know when it's done.. We might want to write a review and then do a trial-error time. Acid, you still run HBOxy?
Nah i dont, i am working with HBX now..
and guys!!!
Fuck off i cant help it its a habbit
Spelling Correction! *habit* vs *habbit*.. HABIT!

Grammar correction! Correction should be lowercase!

Acidx · Post by **Acidx** » Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:45 pm

bone-you wrote:
Sentinel wrote:
Acidx wrote: Nah i dont, i am working with HBX now..
and guys!!!
Fuck off i cant help it its a habbit
Spelling Correction! *habit* vs *habbit*.. HABIT!
Grammar correction! Correction should be lowercase!

damn son... owned

Orkl · Post by **Orkl** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:02 am

Acidx wrote:
bone-you wrote:
Sentinel wrote: Spelling Correction! *habit* vs *habbit*.. HABIT!
Grammar correction! Correction should be lowercase!
damn son... owned

agreed.. owned...

Acidx · Post by **Acidx** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:59 am

This is a stable,effecient, and working anti-cheat app now So far i have it doing CRC32 Compare checks on the files, Processes checks to scan for any known hacking processes, and API Checks to scan for known API's of hacking apps, right now im coding in the engine mapping to scan the proccess list for known engine maps for hacking tools and shit... so far im amazed at how simple this is -.-, also i have the encryption/decryption working for the files.. its pretty amazing.. a stable release is expected sometime in march ill hand it out for a nice beta test before then for some private servers once i get it working 100%, also the scan engine is very impressive, only 1% cpu usage and 10mb of ram to perform it, so its using minimum specs to do its scans, and i got the shittiest pc in the world, so i believe i got us something cooking here for protection.. stay tuned for more updates

p.s. this is made in VB.NET, its made in this language for a reason.. CPP is not intended for small apps like this in my opinion, VB.Net is perfect for these type of apps.. i enjoy it for this main reason.
so if you complain about it or flame, you obviously dont know shit about programming so go for it, this project is not to broaden my skills as a programmer or to show that im kick ass, im doing it for enjoyment and it has its purposes, mainly the best i can say is, im doing it in VB.NET to save time, but at the same time ill still have a powerfull language to aid me.. so gg, i know that alot of people bitch (Daxation) about apps made in VB, that just proves the person doesnt know shit about app design and developement im dont preeching now =P

Sprint · Post by **Sprint** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:27 pm

Acidx wrote:

This is a stable,effecient, and working anti-cheat app now So far i have it doing CRC32 Compare checks on the files, Processes checks to scan for any known hacking processes, and API Checks to scan for known API's of hacking apps, right now im coding in the engine mapping to scan the proccess list for known engine maps for hacking tools and shit... so far im amazed at how simple this is -.-, also i have the encryption/decryption working for the files.. its pretty amazing.. a stable release is expected sometime in march ill hand it out for a nice beta test before then for some private servers once i get it working 100%, also the scan engine is very impressive, only 1% cpu usage and 10mb of ram to perform it, so its using minimum specs to do its scans, and i got the shittiest pc in the world, so i believe i got us something cooking here for protection.. stay tuned for more updates

p.s. this is made in VB.NET, its made in this language for a reason.. CPP is not intended for small apps like this in my opinion, VB.Net is perfect for these type of apps.. i enjoy it for this main reason.
so if you complain about it or flame, you obviously dont know shit about programming so go for it, this project is not to broaden my skills as a programmer or to show that im kick ass, im doing it for enjoyment and it has its purposes, mainly the best i can say is, im doing it in VB.NET to save time, but at the same time ill still have a powerfull language to aid me.. so gg, i know that alot of people bitch (Daxation) about apps made in VB, that just proves the person doesnt know shit about app design and developement im dont preeching now =P

I know, iv been using it a bit (not that I can code

). And the visual studio is much better for making programs, when you have the code and the visual separated, and its much faster to test too ^_^ (you dont need to compile the whole shit, it checks for errors and then you have the app in front of your eyes

)

KLKS · Post by **KLKS** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:34 pm

your app will get owned in 10 mins

.

btw .net isnt the right way to go for this. too much high level shit. it like getting a 500 pound guy walk trough a moving lazer room without setting off the alarms

Sprint · Post by **Sprint** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:14 pm

KLKS wrote: your app will get owned in 10 mins .

btw .net isnt the right way to go for this. too much high level shit. it like getting a 500 pound guy walk trough a moving lazer room without setting off the alarms

wtf is wrong with .net and vb?!?!? Everyone hates it but I like it the most of all, so much clearer (no {} ; eg)

Hypnotoad · Post by **Hypnotoad** » Mon Feb 26, 2007 11:02 pm

Umm..Doesn't the client do something very similar to this. It searches for specific named applications running in the process list. Thats why WPE was renamed so you can run it in the background. All a person needs to do is change the name/hex of their packet editor/hack tool and bam. I guess you can make it scan for a specific pattern in memory, but ugh--this is just a lame 2d game from the 90s. Do you really need super stealth for it. You will have better luck creating better client-to-server code than creating the 3rd party scan tools. These always end up the suck.

You will have to release some code so servers can become compatible with this tool. Someone can just create a dummy app to fake a success result message.

Sentinel · Post by **Sentinel** » Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:54 am

Rofl.. You should've came back a LONG time ago, Hypno.

Acidx · Post by **Acidx** » Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:58 pm

Hypnotoad wrote: Umm..Doesn't the client do something very similar to this. It searches for specific named applications running in the process list. Thats why WPE was renamed so you can run it in the background. All a person needs to do is change the name/hex of their packet editor/hack tool and bam. I guess you can make it scan for a specific pattern in memory, but ugh--this is just a lame 2d game from the 90s. Do you really need super stealth for it. You will have better luck creating better client-to-server code than creating the 3rd party scan tools. These always end up the suck.

You will have to release some code so servers can become compatible with this tool. Someone can just create a dummy app to fake a success result message.

Nah ill have a nice little encryption/decryption with program
You use a key to decrypt/encrypt
Its hackable but fuck no one with the brain power can do it
as for Memory scan, it does CRC32 compares, Caption compares..
And a few other methods, its got a pretty good scan engine going on at the moment..
Btw where the hell u been hypno i change msns and never hear from u again...